Director Neill Blomkamp teams with producer Peter Jackson for this tale of extraterrestrial refugees stuck in contemporary South Africa. It's been 2. 8 years since the aliens made first contact, but there was never any attack from the skies, nor any profound technological revelation capable of advancing our society. Instead, the aliens were treated as refugees. They were the last of their kind, and in order to accommodate them, the government of South Africa set up a makeshift home in District 9 as politicians and world leaders debated how to handle the situation. As the humans begin to grow wary of the unwelcome intruders, a private company called Multi- National United (MNU) is assigned the task of controlling the aliens.

• InformationWeek.com: News, analysis and research for business technology professionals, plus peer-to-peer knowledge sharing. Engage with our community.
• Director Neill Blomkamp teams with producer Peter Jackson for this tale of extraterrestrial refugees stuck in contemporary South Africa. It's been 28 years since the.
• 수고합니다 도서목록 중에 역사/철학⇒역사일반 역사의 연구3 이 누락되었으므로 올려 주십시요.
• TheFutonCritic.com is the web's best resource for series information about primetime television.
• Reminds me of gamergate a couple of years(?) back and how a staggering amount of people figured that rape/death threats, online harassment, posting personal info.
• Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get.

But MNU is less interested in the aliens' welfare than attempting to understand how their weaponry works. Should they manage to make that breakthrough, they will receive tremendous profits to fund their research. Unfortunately, the highly advanced weaponry requires alien DNA in order to be activated. When MNU field operative Wikus van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley) is exposed to biotechnology that causes his DNA to mutate, the tensions between the aliens and the humans intensifies. Wikus is the key to unlocking the alien's technology, and he quickly becomes the most wanted man on the planet. Ostracized and isolated, Wikus retreats to District 9 in a desperate bid to shake his dogged pursuers.

Jason Buchanan, Rovi.

AMC Slams Movie. Pass, Threatening Legal Action – Variety. AMC Theatres is threatening legal action against Movie. Pass, a subscription- based service for cinema- goers, hours after the company announced it will allow customers to see a movie a day for less than $1.

Web oficial de la Universidade da Coruña. Enlaces a centros, departamentos, servicios, planes de estudios. Arlana's Corner offers 100% free Freebies - Updated daily!

In a statement, the world’s largest exhibitor dismissed Movie. Pass as “a small fringe player” and said that its model “is not in the best interest of moviegoers, movie theatres and movie studios.”AMC’s stock has been hit hard in recent weeks after it released disappointing quarterly earnings and lowered its projections for 2.

The summer box office is in a slump and a stream of film flops have dragged down exhibition stocks. Shares of AMC took a beating again on Tuesday following Movie. Pass’ pricing announcement — the company’s stock ended the day down 2.

Movie. Pass didn’t just unveil a new pricing plan on Tuesday. It also announced that had sold a majority stake to Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc., a publicly traded data firm, for an undisclosed price. Since it was founded in 2. Privileged Season 1 Episode 1 Free Online. Movie. Pass has roiled exhibitors, who have engaged in legal action at various points to try to stop its development.

In an interview with Variety, Movie. Pass CEO Mitch Lowe said the deal has yet to close, but expressed concern that AMC’s stance could hurt his business.“I’m not worried about it killing the sale,” he said. What I’m worried about is it confusing customers and making them believe they can’t use this service at AMC theaters.”Movie.

Pass is using the capital injection from the sale to fund an overhaul to its pricing model. It will now enable customers to see a movie a day in a theater for a $9. Movie. Pass re- sells the tickets to customers and purchases them at full price using a Master. Card debit card. It claims it boosts attendance by 1.

But exhibitors have preferred to bolster their own loyalty programs instead of aligning themselves with the service. For instance, AMC has invested heavily in growing its Stubs rewards program. In the statement, AMC said it is consulting with its attorneys to determine if or how it can prevent a subscription program offered by Movie. Pass from being used at its locations. It questioned the longterm viability of Movie. Pass’ model, noting that the average ticket price for watching a movie at AMC Theatres in the most recent financial quarter was $9.

From what we can tell, by definition and absent some other form of other compensation, Movie. Pass will be losing money on every subscriber seeing two movies or more in a month,” AMC’s statement reads.

Lowe acknowledges that his company is subsidizing ticket buyers and will lose money in the process. However, he believes that Movie.

Pass will be able to prove its value to movie theaters and studios, and that in the future they will cut the company in on their additional profits. Theater owners could also either pay Movie. Pass back with advertising or give them a percentage of the concessions sales.“There must be some way to make us whole,” said Lowe. We know we have to prove the value we deliver and, at that point in time, where we’re delivering value to studios and theaters, we can work together with them in a constructive manner so that everybody makes more money.”At one point, AMC and Movie. Pass had worked in concert with each other. In 2. 01. 5, the companies partnered on a pilot program in select markets.

Ironically, Movie. Pass uses data from that initiative to support its claims that it bolsters concessions sales and attendance. In the ensuing years, AMC has gone from ally to foe. On Tuesday, it was withering in its dismissal of Movie.

Pass’ ambitions. In the statement, it said “that it is not yet known how to turn lead into gold,” adding, “In AMC’s view, that price level is unsustainable and only sets up consumers for ultimate disappointment down the road if or when the product can no longer be fulfilled.”The company said that reducing pricing to accommodate the Movie. Pass model would negatively impact the customer experience and would leave them unable to “operate quality theaters.” It went on to suggest that the Movie. Pass model would have a chilling effect on the creative community by cutting them out of the income they receive from movie theaters.“While AMC is not opposed to subscription programs generally, the one envisioned by Movie. Pass is not one AMC can embrace,” the company’s statement reads. We are actively working now to determine whether it may be feasible to opt out and not participate in this shaky and unsustainable program.”Lowe, a co- founder of Netflix and the former head of Redbox, compared AMC’s reaction to the blowback those home entertainment companies received from movie studios and video rental chains when they offered DVDs by mail or via kiosks.“This is so much like Blockbuster was when we rolled out Netflix or Redbox,” said Lowe. It’s the big guy being afraid of the little guy offering better value to consumers.”.